rogersnow asked: Wow you are just a worthless fucking turd of a human being.
Harassment, wonderful. I hope you don’t mind other people seeing you for who you are.
rogersnow asked: Wow you are just a worthless fucking turd of a human being.
Harassment, wonderful. I hope you don’t mind other people seeing you for who you are.
Anonymous asked: ' “Free speech” is nothing but a shield used to protect ideas that actively harm the oppressed. ' I hope to god your'e joking, or being ironic, or are clinically brain-dead, because that has to be the most backwards, totalitarian, IngSoc-laden mentality you could possibly have. Did you forget that ,without free speech, you wouldn't be allowed to voice your dissent? Come on junior, time to actually -finish- those lines of thought rather than just regurgitating mind-vomit.
Read what I’ve written, and then respond. Don’t assume my position based on your own biases.
Anonymous asked: Cool troll blog yo
Ah, yes. Because my views are so far out of your range of comprehension, I must be a troll.
Anonymous asked: free speech is breddy gud
It can be good, and it can be evil. And in these times, too many people are using it for evil.
Anonymous asked: post/145153357073 Oppressing free speech won't make people think a different way. It'd just make them express them in more secretive ways. Educating someone as to why their way of thinking isn't entirely right is usually a far better method.
And what about the people who cannot be educated? The ones who can’t unlearn hatred, or cannot be convinced? What are we to do with them?
connard-cynique asked: Our generation doesn't need freedom of speech anymore, we knows what is right and what ideas should be enforced on the population.
Strawman.
“Two weeks ago a man in France was arrested for raping his daughter. She’d gone to her school counselor and then the police, but they needed “hard evidence.” So, she videotaped her next assault. Her father was eventually arrested. His attorney explained, “There was a period when he was unemployed and in the middle of a divorce. He insists that these acts did not stretch back further than three or four months. His daughter says longer. But everyone should be very careful in what they say.” Because, really, even despite her seeking help, her testimony, her bravery in setting up a webcam to film her father raping her, you really can’t believe what the girl says, can you?
Everyone “knows” this. Even children.
Three years ago, in fly-on-the-wall fashion of parent drivers everywhere, I listened while a 14-year-old girl in the back seat of my car described how angry she was that her parents had stopped allowing her to walk home alone just because a girl in her neighborhood “claimed she was raped.” When I asked her if there was any reason to think the girl’s story was not true, she said, “Girls lie about rape all the time.” She didn’t know the person, she just assumed she was lying…
No one says, “You can’t trust women,” but distrust them we do. College students surveyed revealed that they think up to 50% of their female peers lie when they accuse someone of rape, despite wide-scale evidence and multi-country studies that show the incident of false rape reports to be in the 2%-8% range, pretty much the same as false claims for other crimes. As late as 2003, people jokingly (wink, wink) referred to Philadelphia’s sex crimes unit as “the lying bitch unit.” If an 11-year-old girl told an adult that her father took out a Craigslist ad to find someone to beat and rape her while he watched, as recently actually occurred, what do you think the response would be? Would she need to provide a videotape after the fact?
It goes way beyond sexual assault as well. That’s just the most likely and obvious demonstration of “women are born to lie” myths. Women’s credibility is questioned in the workplace, in courts, by law enforcement, in doctors’ offices, and in our political system. People don’t trust women to be bosses, or pilots, or employees. Pakistan’s controversial Hudood Ordinance still requires a female rape victim to procure four male witnesses to her rape or risk prosecution for adultery. In August, a survey of managers in the United States revealed that they overwhelmingly distrust women who request flextime. It’s notable, of course, that women are trusted to be mothers—the largest pool of undervalued, unpaid, economically crucial labor.”
Soraya Chemaly, How We Teach Our Kids That Women Are Liars
Remember: Women are three times less likely to lie than men. The stigma has no factual basis, and is rooted in misogyny.
(via smitethepatriarchy)
— Andrea Dworkin (September 26, 1946 – April 9, 2005) was an American radical feminist and writer best known for her criticism of pornography, which she argued was linked to violence against women.
(via feministsorgnow)
“Free speech” is nothing but a shield used to protect ideas that actively harm the oppressed.
“We don’t let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas” ~ Joseph Stalin
Ideas can be more dangerous and when you want to silence one the correct response is to silence you. We become robots in the oppressed world that you idiots want.
Wrong. By preventing dangerous ideas from being spread, through the use of censorship, fewer people learn about them, and the ideas ultimately die out.
Bigotry is learned, it is not inherent in anyone. If we are to eliminate it, we have to employ tools such as censorship. Why would anyone disagree, unless they find some redeeming quality in hateful, violent rhetoric?
I agree that censorship will work. Prohibition certainly worked. Crime went down and people most certainly DID NOT smuggle alcohol. We should just censor things we don’t like because then people won’t talk about them. We should protect everyone’s feelings because that’s more important than having a dialogue.
This isn’t about protecting feelings, this is about protecting livelihoods.
Think about it. Why has racial violence against black people decreased since the 1960s? Because racism became stigmatized. The n-word was semi-censored in public (not counting it being reclaimed, of course), and look what an effect it had. We had the dialogue, and we said that racism was intolerable. And our society is quick to say that we abhor sexism, and now homophobia, but we don’t take the extra step to prove it. We still allow the ideas to fester, and then they result in events like Elliot Rodger’s massacre, for example.
If we destroy the speech, we destroy the idea. Then we won’t have to worry about it being censored, because the idea will no longer exist.
(via skeleton-lad)
“Free speech” is nothing but a shield used to protect ideas that actively harm the oppressed.
“We don’t let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas” ~ Joseph Stalin
Ideas can be more dangerous and when you want to silence one the correct response is to silence you. We become robots in the oppressed world that you idiots want.
Wrong. By preventing dangerous ideas from being spread, through the use of censorship, fewer people learn about them, and the ideas ultimately die out.
Bigotry is learned, it is not inherent in anyone. If we are to eliminate it, we have to employ tools such as censorship. Why would anyone disagree, unless they find some redeeming quality in hateful, violent rhetoric?