stat tracker for tumblr
September 28, 2016

Let me clarify something, because it seems that people either refuse to read my initial essay about free speech, or they are choosing to remain ignorant.

“Free speech” is nothing but a shield used to protect ideas that actively harm the oppressed.

This is in reference to people calling themselves “champions” of free speech. The sorts of people like those in the alt-right, who actively and intentionally use “free speech” as an excuse to defend their harassment and violent rhetoric.

Now read it once again, thinking of these people. Why are they so adamant about defending “free speech”? Because if people finally stand up and say that speech deserves restrictions for the protection of social progress, the are no longer able to defend the open exhibition their bigoted, harmful ideas.

To make it absolutely clear: I am not against free speech. I am against the concept of the marketplace of ideas, as well as an absolutist approach to free speech. I believe that certain forms of speech should be restricted and/or censored for the general welfare of society. That’s what my essay was all about, the necessity of placing certain limits on free speech, and not holding it as a gold standard of civilization that should never be questioned.

You don’t end hate speech with more speech. The Internet has made the marketplace of ideas irrelevant, and “bad ideas” are no longer being pushed out, they’re just moving into certain corners of society, where they are allowed to fester, and as long as they exist, we cannot progress.

September 24, 2016

Apologies for what’s about to come, but I’d like to illustrate the amount of harassment I’ve received for my posts regarding the failures of free speech. Take a moment to read them. I will tag these posts with “Answered.”

11:20pm  |   URL: https://tmblr.co/ZKqU3i2CXwXFb
Filed under: NT 
June 12, 2016
Guns are enabling hate crimes.

I’m angry. I won’t be as cordial as I usually am in my posts.

Mass shootings have become something of a norm in the US. Turn on the news, see a breaking story, and think, “Another one?” That is not fucking normal.

Gun violence is an issue. Hate crimes are an issue. Guns enable hate crimes. They are responsible for the murder of women, POC, LGBT+ folks, among others.

But there are still people who think the “freedom” to keep and bear arms is somehow more important than protecting human lives. That an outdated portion of the Constitution is more important than protecting the innocent.

FUCK ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS WORTH MORE THAN THE LIVES OF MARGINALIZES PEOPLE.

Unfortunately, gun control isn’t the answer, either. It’s not enough when states with strict laws still enable men to buy a gun and shoot up a school, or a church, or a gay nightclub. It’s not enough.

The only solution we have left is disarmament. Confiscate firearms. Similar regulations have worked for the UK, France, Spain, Australia, Japan, and South Korea.

It’s time the US cared more about human lives than its fetishization with firearms.

June 9, 2016

It seems someone has posted my content to TumblrInAction on Reddit, which is responsible for the amount of attention and the influx of messages that I’ve received.

Your harassment will not silence me. It only proves my points further. You are using your “free speech” to try and force me into submission. It will not work. You will fail.

I will continue my work, and you will never persuade me otherwise.

May 16, 2016
On Today’s Magic: The Gathering Announcement

Little-known fact—I am a fan of Magic: The Gathering.

Today’s announcement was amazing from a progressive point of view.

Wizards of the Coast is ending the name “Fat Packs” in favor of “Bundles,” which is an amazing start. Our society tends to throw the word “fat” around without knowing how it affects people dealing with body image issues, or how it seeks to reinforce sizeist marginalization. Removing the descriptor “fat” for a product is an acknowledgement that such a word is neither inviting nor empowering, and has no place in a game that is intended to be safe and welcoming for all people.

Additionally, the set after “Eldritch Moon” will be “Kaladesh,” which is described as a “diverse plane with many ethnicities – including, prominently, many humans who look Indian.” The first planeswalker revealed from this set is not only a person of color, but a woman of color, further adding to Magic’s diversity. Additionally, this is yet another new, female-identified planeswalker. For comparison, the last new, humanoid, male-identified planeswalker was Dack Fayden in 2014′s “Conspiracy” set (not counting Commander 2014). In the two years since, we’ve had three new planeswalkers introduced, who were all female-identified (Narset, Arlinn Kord, and now Saheeli Rai).

In a game that is dominated by straight, white men, increasing the diversity of figures seen in such a way not only extends the hand to a more diverse playerbase to the game, but also tells anyone who objects that they are no longer welcome. The way that Wizards of the Coast has handled Magic in the past years, from inclusion of diverse identities; to taking a zero-tolerance policy towards sex offenders as players; to openly supporting the trans and gender-nonconforming community in events; is nothing short of incredible, and exactly the kind of behavior that is necessary to defeat bigotry and toxicity.

April 6, 2016

Hello, new followers.

I’ve announced this on Twitter, but not here.

I will be writing a follow-up essay to “Abridging the Freedom of Speech,” specifically to answer the criticism that has erupted against it, recently.

Some comments I will address along the way:

  • “You want to eliminate all free speech/police thoughts.”
  • “Eliminating speech does not eliminate ideas. It allows them to fester.”
  • “Freedom of speech should be for everyone, not just those you agree with.”
  • “Your ideas are unsafe and undesirable, therefore by your own argument, your speech should be eliminated.”
  • “Who decides who is oppressed?”
  • “Is there a contemporary community standard committee that will define acceptable speech, like one might find in DPRK?”
  • “Who appoints censor for elimination of ideas? What is the penalty for thinking?”
  • “If speech is restricted, then it is not free.“

This will be different from my other essays, since this will be written specifically as a response, but nevertheless, I hope you read it and learn something.

4:36am  |   URL: https://tmblr.co/ZKqU3i24aC6fh
Filed under: NT 
March 23, 2016

Incoming essay on racism. This one will likely make people very angry. I request that you read it to completion and consider what it says before reacting.

10:47am  |   URL: https://tmblr.co/ZKqU3i23qvNdM
Filed under: NT 
February 8, 2016

My next piece will be on the current state of our justice system. Look forward to it this week.

1:34pm  |   URL: https://tmblr.co/ZKqU3i21PJ2HS
Filed under: NT 
Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »